http://blog.nelhage.com/2010/01/git-in-pictures/ It's software. It's made of bugs. Fri, 03 Feb 2012 17:48:35 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1 http://blog.nelhage.com/2010/01/git-in-pictures/comment-page-1/#comment-669 links for 2010-03-27 - Eric Reboisson's Blog Sat, 27 Mar 2010 18:06:28 +0000 http://blog.nelhage.com/?p=74#comment-669 <p>[...] Made of Bugs » Git in pictures (tags: scm git) [...]</p> [...] Made of Bugs » Git in pictures (tags: scm git) [...]

]]> http://blog.nelhage.com/2010/01/git-in-pictures/comment-page-1/#comment-418 nelhage Mon, 25 Jan 2010 15:13:50 +0000 http://blog.nelhage.com/?p=74#comment-418 <p>Yeah, I considered drawing the --amend commit a row down, but I decided to leave it on the same line because I think it makes the picture look better -- pushing it down makes the image harder to read, in my opinion.</p> Yeah, I considered drawing the –amend commit a row down, but I decided to leave it on the same line because I think it makes the picture look better — pushing it down makes the image harder to read, in my opinion.

]]> http://blog.nelhage.com/2010/01/git-in-pictures/comment-page-1/#comment-417 Edward Z. Yang Mon, 25 Jan 2010 04:18:45 +0000 http://blog.nelhage.com/?p=74#comment-417 <p>In my opinion, the commit object for commit --amend should be one row down, as mentally it's not a "new" commit. Other than that, great pictures! (I certainly was confused what git reset HEAD did in the past; Now I Know!)</p> In my opinion, the commit object for commit –amend should be one row down, as mentally it’s not a “new” commit. Other than that, great pictures! (I certainly was confused what git reset HEAD did in the past; Now I Know!)

]]>